The best prices for official DELL PowerEdge R760 servers in Ukraine.
Free consultation by phone +38 (067) 819 38 38
Available server models from the warehouse in Kyiv:
-
Server Dell PowerEdge R760 - Intel Xeon Silver 4510 2.4-4.1Ghz 12 Cores
-
Server Dell PowerEdge R760 - Intel Xeon Silver 4514Y 2.0-3.4Ghz 16 Cores
-
Server Dell PowerEdge R760 - Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y 2.8-3.9Ghz 16 Cores
-
Server Dell PowerEdge R760 - Intel Xeon Gold 5420+ 2.0-4.1Ghz 28 Cores
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ Specifications
We started with a Dell configuration in our R760 that included two Intel 6430 processors and 1TB of DDR5 4800 RAM before replacing them with 8592+ processors. While the Xeon 6340 wasn't the top of the Sapphire Rapids family, we'll still compare it to the Xeon 8592+. We're putting them side by side in this review not to show them as direct competitors, but to demonstrate the potential of the existing platforms with the release of the new Emerald Rapids processors.
We've included the numbers for the Sapphire Rapids Platinum 8480+, as well as the HP ML350 for comparison with the Xeon 8592+ to get closer numbers. The 8480+ in the ML350 Ge11 is one spot away from being the best processor in the Sapphire Rapids lineup. It's worth noting that we're only looking at the processors, not comparing the servers themselves.
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ Processor (R760) | Intel Xeon Gold 6430 Processor (R760) | Intel Xeon Platinum 8480+ Processor (ML350 G11) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | 5th, Emerald Rapids | 4th, Sapphire Rapids | 4th, Sapphire Rapids |
| Cores | 64 | 32 | 56 |
| Threads | 128 | 64 | 112 |
| Base Frequency | 1.9 GHz | 2.10 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Cache | 320MB | 60MB | 105MB |
| Intel UPI Speed | 20 GT/s | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s |
| Max UPI Links | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| TDP | 350W | 270W | 350W |
| Launch Date | Q4 '23 | Q1 '23 | Q1 '23 |
| Max Memory Size | 4TB | ||
| Memory Types | DDR5 5600 MT/s (1 DPC) | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s (1DPC and 2DPC) | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC |
| Max # Memory Channels | 8 | ||
| PCIe Rev | 5 | ||
| Max # PCIe Lanes | 80 | ||
| High Priority Cores | 20 @ 2.1 GHz | 12 @ 2.2 GHz | 16 @ 2.1 GHz |
| Low Priority Cores | 44 @ 1.7 GHz | 20 @ 1.8GHz | 40 @ 1.7GHz |
| Default Max EPC size for Intel SGX | 512GB | 128GB | 512GB |
| Product Page | |||
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ Processor Performance
Blender OptiX
First up is Blender OptiX, an open source 3D modeling program. This benchmark was run using the Blender Benchmark CLI utility. The score is the number of samples per minute, the higher the better.
The Xeon 8592+ processors are off to a great start, more than doubling the performance of the Xeon 6430, which is in line with the specs. However, the Xeon 8480+ comes close to the Xeon 8592+ by 81 points in the class.
| Blender 4.0 CPU | 2x Xeon Platinum 8592+(ER) (R760 – 1TB DDR5 4800MHz) | 2x Xeon Gold 6430(SR) (R760 – 1TB DDR5 4800MHz) | 2x Xeon Platinum 8480+(SR) (ML350 G11 – 256GB DDR5 4400MHz) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monster | 1115.057 | 540.039 | 943,300 |
| Junkshop | 780,408 | 361,066 | 627,662 |
| Classroom | 556,550 | 278,228 | 475,144 |
Cinebench R23
Maxon's Cinebench R23 is a CPU rendering benchmark that uses all cores and threads of the processor. We ran it for both multi- and single-core tests. The higher the score, the better. In this test, we see about twice as much performance on the Emerald Rapids Xeon 8592+ as on the Sapphire Rapids 6430. We saw slightly better single-core performance on the Xeon 8480+ than on the Xeon 8592+, but that wasn't a surprise since the Xeon 8480+ had a higher base clock speed. The Xeon 8592+ pulled ahead in the multi-core test.
| Cinebench R23 | 2x Xeon Platinum 8592+(ER) (R760 – 1TB DDR5 4800MHz) | 2x Xeon Gold 6430(SR) (R760 – 1TB DDR5 4800MHz) | 2x Xeon Platinum 8480+(SR) (ML350 G11 – 256GB DDR5 4400MHz) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Multi-Core | 110,498 | 69,663 | 79,164 |
| Single Core CPU | 1,144 | 1,022 | 1,461 |
| MP Ratio | 96.63x | 68.17x | 54.20x |
Cinebench 2024
Here are the CPU results for the Cinebench 2024 version.
We saw a similar performance pattern between the three processors, as in Cinebench R23.
| Cinebench 2024 | 2x Xeon Platinum 8592+(ER) (R760 – 1TB DDR5 4800MHz) | 2x Xeon Gold 6430(SR) (R760 – 1TB DDR5 4800MHz) | 2x Xeon Platinum 8480+(SR) (ML350 G11 – 256GB DDR5 4400MHz) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Multi-Core | 6,001 | 3,746 | 4,699 |
| Single Core CPU | 68 | 59 | 76 |
| MP Ratio | 88.48x | 63.22x | 61.44x |
Geekbench 6
Geekbench 6 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures overall system performance. The higher the score, the better. Geekbench offers a graphics test, but without the GPU, we only have CPU results.
*We had issues with the Emerald Rapids Xeon 8592+ in this test and it didn't complete, so we'll get back to this issue when we can get performance numbers. So far we only have results for the Xeon 6430s and Xeon 8480+s*.
| Geekbench 6 | 2x Xeon Platinum 8592+(ER) (R760 – 1TB DDR5 4800MHz) | 2x Xeon Gold 6430(SR) (R760 – 1TB DDR5 4800MHz) | 2x Xeon Platinum 8480+(SR) (ML350 G11 – 256GB DDR5 4400MHz) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Benchmark -Single Core | N/A | 1,488 | 1,939 |
| CPU Benchmark – Multi Core | N/A | 16,054 | 15,218 |
CPU-Z
While this isn't exactly a benchmark, we thought it was worth mentioning the difference in memory speed since the only change is the installed processor.
First, we took a picture of the memory tab for the Sapphire Rapids Xeon 6430 that were originally installed in our R760.
Next is a snapshot of the memory tab for the Emerald Rapids Xeon 8592+.
There is some difference in memory timing on the Xeon 8592+, making it slightly lower than our Xeon 6430, but probably not enough to affect performance in most real-world applications.
Conclusion
As expected, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ performed much better in most tests than the Xeon 6430, but that's only logical since they're not direct competitors. When we add the Xeon 8480+, we see the performance gap shrink significantly, as it's the direct predecessor to the Xeon 8592+. A big advantage of the 5th Gen Xeon chips is that they use the same socket as the 4th Gen, allowing us to upgrade older platforms in the field, as we've done with some of our other servers.
We saw significant performance improvements across all of our workloads between the two Intel Xeon 4th Gen processors and the Xeon 8592+ 5th Gen. The biggest improvements were seen in our compute workloads, such as y-cruncher. In our 25 billion runs, we measured times on the Gold 6430 and Platinum 8480+ of 229 and 187 seconds respectively, decreasing to 157 seconds on the Platinum 8592+. There was also a significant performance boost in Cinebench R23 and 2024, going from the Platinum 8480+ 4th Gen to the Platinum 8592+ 5th Gen. In R23, we saw a performance jump from 79k to 110k, and in 2024, the speed increased from 4,699 to 6,001.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ marks a big step forward for the company, and while it can't compete with AMD's powerful chips, the 8592+ has unique strengths that make it an attractive choice. Intel has heavily optimized these processors for AI and high-performance computing, offering solid performance across the board.
How can we help?
Server Solutions sells Dell PowerEdge R760 and Dell PowerEdge R760xs servers throughout Ukraine, our clients include small, medium and large businesses. If you or your company needs advice and the purchase of quality server equipment, then you should contact us.